Blog posts fragments from the Jason Calovito web site where Kal posted. Freelance Kitty 14.
Monday,
January 5, 2015
The
Great Flood Myths are Just That Some Say
Here
is a little bit on the Ancient Aliens episode about the Great Flood from
December as well. The review of is Jason Calavito's blog. I posted there under
the name Kal. I am going to just print my post and discuss the flood myths
later.
Kal
12/25/2014
4:12pm
Great floods are similar in cultures that
lived by rivers or oceans. This does not mean that 'the Bible flood' is the one
they are all talking about, even if as a Christian it's supposed to be believed
that way. To make it seem like a comet or asteroid did it, is fiction, and is
impossible to prove. Maybe they will find the Ark while the other show will
find the Grail and someone will find the Yule log of Santa, his petrified poop,
at the North Pole. These shows should not be on History. They should be on a
fantasy channel. Some of the speculators think that these
ancient cultures are just recalling the ice age when when their seashore
communities flooded at the end, but that isn't proven either.
No one has found the Ark of Noah, but
many have tried. The problem is that the ark isn't there anymore. It was made
of wood. Wood decays over time. It has not been petrified in ice. Also there is
no indication from Genesis that Noah and his offspring kept the boat intact.
They probably took it apart to build the city. As for seeds, it was plant seeds, not
DNA. They didn't understand DNA back then.
The Ark was not an alien ship. But what
doesn't make sense is the space required to house and feed that many animals,
something that even pastors can't explain to me. The thing was as large as a
modern cruise ship. No way were there enough rooms, or enough food. The animals
would have either eaten the other animals, or starved.Really they missed the opportunity to do
a Christmas mystery story. Ho
ho ho...
Kal
12/25/2014
4:17pm
Also place names have changed since
Genesis. The current Mt. Ararat is not the same mountain as the one called that
in the Bible.
Kal
12/30/2014
2:23pm
Science fiction books have speculated on
the comet and ark story too, but they are fiction. It doesn't seem that the AA
guys know the difference. Having just seen a rerun of this episode last night,
I conclude they don't even care about their own alleged facts. At one end they
claim the end of the last ice age for the ark, (not Biblical), while then they
claim the Younger Dryas (which was later), and a third time they claim 9,5000
BC, and others, 7,000 BC.
The sunken Indian ruins are from only
4,000 years ago, not 7,000 and not 9,000 years ago. The eruption of a volcano
and an earth quake at the time sunk the city. It is not from the flood.
Also Puma Punku has nothing what so ever
to do with the flood. Sea shells were found there. That is not proof of
anything. It means way back in time, long before us, that area was a lake at
sea level.
The DNA bank? Really? Like in Titan AE?
Come on, that's a cartoon from the 1990s.
The
ark was actually about as large as a modern cruise ship so they could not have
stored every animal, which is true. How does that make the leap to DNA bank?
They might as well claim Noah was a watcher. Oh wait, they did. That's
laughable. Nowhere but in their weird ideas could he have been an aliens.
Is everything an alien with these people?
For crying out loud. It was funny though. That terrible CGI alien Noah was a
gut buster.
No comments:
Post a Comment